Search Engine Optimization - SEO Services
IMS understands that SEO is the art of achieving organic listings through the balance of on page and off page coding. We research the search engine trends and market competition on an ongoing basis to ensure your success. Read about our SEO Services...
| Quality Rater from Google |
| Search Engine News |
| Monday, 02 February 2009 00:00 |
|
The guidelines for quality rater from Google have been leaked by one of there staff. The document is packed with information valuable to anyone trying to rank a site high in Google's SERPs. Download Google's quality rater Document This document shows how quality raters score pages, clasify search queries and treat spam and includes screenshots of quality raters hubs, forums and more. In this article we will review the most important aspects of the quality rater document. Raters only rate pages:Googles leaked document talks about 'landing pages', as opposed to 'domains'. Senior people like Matt Cutts analyze sites on the domain level, but quality raters are only responsible for rating individual pages for specific search queries. In other words, a quality rater could exclude a specific page for a specific search query, but could not exclude the entire domain from that query, or the individual page from all queries. Importance of Country to relevance:This is a primary factor in Google's scoring system, on numerous occassions in the document, raters are shown sample queries that specify [query], language (country). If the page is relevant to the query, but is not relevant to the country the user is in, the page may be excluded. So in short, if there is a mismatch between the query and the location, then the rating is lowered. Understanding the query:The document states: You should understand each query before you evaluate it. If the meaning of the query is unclear, you will need to do web research to learn about it. You can do this by entering the query in the search box of one or more search engines and looking at the results returned by them. Google tries to ensure that they understand a users search query, instead of matching words and phrases. For example: For the query 'football', it could be [football], english (US) - the interpretation in this case is american football, with an oval ball or [football], english (UK) - the interpretation in this case is british soccer, with a round ball. The type of query is not crucial, these are the main categories: Navigational Your basic request, 'ebay', 'Yahoo directories' or 'microsoft.com'. Informational A query looking for information, 'how to stop smoking' for example. Transactional A query to find a product to buy. Rating scale This is informative, Google classifies pages as:
Vital:The query has a dominant interpretation which is navigational. The evaluated page is the official web page for the query. For example, for the query 'BMW 3 series', the vital page is http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/3series/overview.html, this is the official product page on the correct site. Useful:A rating of Useful is assigned to pages that contain some or all of the following characteristics: highly satisfying, comprehensive, high in quality, and authoritative. Useful pages answer the query just right; they are neither too broad nor too specific. In my opinion this accounts for about 80% of Google's search results. According to Googles document, these are the types of useful pages:
You should aim to have most of your pages classified as useful by filling them with good content, thereby creating highly informative pages and or pages that allow the user to complete the desired transaction. This will keep both your users and Google satisfied. The Google Hilltop Algorithim:Browse the Hilltop White Paper Hilltop algorithim is another fix for PageRank. Google realized that a high PR page could pass authority to a totally disrelated page through a link. This meant that a site with lots of unrelated links would rank highly in the search engines. Hilltop supposedly sorted this out and now a link to a toy shop site from a high PR page about gardening would count for very little. Hilltop is similar to Trust Rank, but more automated, relying on 'expert documents' and links from them to other documents with the assumption that:
The Hilltop white paper also suggests that the Title tag and Header tags are very important, a fact that we see more and more, we believe that the title tag is the most important of all the tags, browse our SEO ranking influences for more information. Hilltop & search engine optimization: The trick here is to spot and get links from these 'expert documents', aim for editorial links from authority websites, much as most SEO professionals have been advocating for some time. Spotting authorative sites:Look for a site in the SERPs (search engine results pages) that has a sitelink, these are links below the first search result, links to subsections of the site in question. Links from these sites are worth gold. Also look at the back link profile of the site you concider to be an authority site. Use Yahoo Site Explorer to analyse these back links, you might find that the root hubs that link to your site are even more authorative. Conclusion:Trust Rank and Hilltop were introduced by Google to minimize the effects of overly aggressive search engine optimization techniques. Prior to the introduction of these two algorithims, SEO professionals could dominate the search results of competitive terms by getting links from high PR sites. With these algorithims in place we now need to focus on authority sites, not just PageRank. Your Google quality rater comments are welcome... |


Become an SEO Expert - SEO Mentoring

0 Comments